From: Subject: Untitled Document Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:03:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: http://silvercreekpc.accountsupport.com/empirecanyonactionmemo.html X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Untitled Document

 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY=20

REGION 8

999 18 TH STREET - SUITE 300

DENVER, CO=20 80202-2466

http://www.epa.gov/region08=20

 

 

Ref: 8EPR-SR

ACTION MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Request for a Non-Time-Critical Removal Action at Empire = Canyon=20 Site

FROM: Jim Christiansen, Remedial Project Manager

Superfund Remedial Program

THROUGH: Bert Garcia, Supervisor

Superfund Remedial Program, Unit B

Dale Vodehnal, Director

Superfund Remedial Program

Carol Rushin, Assistant Regional Administrator

Office of Enforcement, Compliance, and Environmental Justice

TO: Max Dodson, Assistant Regional Administrator

Office of Ecosystems Protection & Remediation

Site ID: 08CP

Category of Removal: Non-Time Critical, PRP-Funded, PRP Lead

I. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Action Memorandum is to request and document = approval of=20 a PRP Lead non-time critical removal action (NTCRA) at the Empire Canyon = Site=20 (=93the Site=94) in Park City, Utah. The Empire Canyon Site is located = within the=20 Upper Silver Creek Watershed, which is the subject of a = stakeholder-based=20 investigation and cleanup effort. This NTCRA is one of several actions = intended=20 to address contamination issues in the watershed. The NTCRA will be = voluntarily=20 funded and performed by United Park City Mines (UPCM). EPA and UPCM are=20 currently negotiating an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) for = performance=20 of the cleanup work.

II. SITE CONDITIONS AND BACKGROUND

A. Site Description and History

The Empire Canyon Site is a historic ore mining and processing area = located=20 near Park City, Summit County, Utah. Empire Canyon is located south of = Park=20 City. The Site is situated on the eastern slope of the Wasatch Range,=20 approximately 25 miles east of Salt Lake City. Park City rests at the = downstream=20 end of Empire Canyon.

The immediate area around the Site consists of steep canyon walls = with=20 mine/mill wastes and mine overburden present in several locations, which = slope=20 directly into the Empire Canyon drainage. The terraces or flat spots in = the=20 canyon are the locations of former mining facilities and a municipal = drinking=20 water tank. There were several mines, a concentrator, assay office, = trams and=20 other mine workings in the canyon up to the drainage divide.

Waste rock piles from the mine operations are located along the = canyon walls=20 as well as in the Empire channel. Several worn trails parallel the = channel and=20 traverse the mill and mine sites. The canyon is a popular area for = residents and=20 visitors to hike and mountain bike. The Empire Canyon drainage = originates=20 approximately one mile to the south near the Summit/Wasatch County line. = Flow=20 originating in the canyon occurs in a small ephemeral channel. This = water forms=20 the headwaters of Silver Creek, which is a tributary of the Weber River. =

Empire Canyon is situated between, and within, the Deer Valley and = Park City=20 Ski Resorts.

1. Removal site evaluation

The Empire Canyon Site was initially investigated in 1996. The Utah=20 Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) conducted a Preliminary = Assessment=20 (PA) of the Site and prepared a work plan for a subsequent Site = Inspection (SI).=20 The PA noted that mine waste and elevated levels of heavy metals were = present at=20 the Site and that additional investigation was warranted. The SI was not = immediately completed.

In 1999, EPA and other stakeholders, under the name of the Upper = Silver Creek=20 Watershed Stakeholder=92s Group (USCWSG), began a collaborative = watershed=20 investigation in the Park City area. At that time, six sites in the area = were=20 already listed on CERCLIS, including the Empire Canyon Site, and a = holistic,=20 watershed approach was deemed necessary. The intent was to investigate = and=20 address collective impacts from historic mining in the Park City area. = One=20 significant environmental impact was the listing of Silver Creek on the = Clean=20 Water Act Section 303(d) list of impaired water bodies due to elevated = levels of=20 zinc and cadmium. As part of this effort, the Stakeholder=92s Group = conducted=20 water and sediment sampling in Silver Creek to pinpoint significant = sources of=20 loading. This work showed that Empire Canyon was a significant source of = metals=20 to Silver Creek and that more detailed investigation was required in the = area.=20 It was also known that there was significant recreational use of the = Empire=20 Canyon area.

Subsequent to this report, UDEQ conducted an Expanded Site Inspection = (ESI).=20 The ESI investigated the Empire Canyon Site in detail and showed which = areas of=20 the canyon were of concern. Based upon the PA, ESI, and watershed=20 investigations, EPA determined that a non-time critical removal action = would be=20 appropriate for Empire Canyon, primarily to address impacts to surface = water. An=20 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) Approval Memo was signed in = early=20 2002. This approval memorandum documented that the use of removal = authority was=20 appropriate for Empire Canyon. United Park City Mines voluntarily = entered into=20 an AOC with EPA to conduct an EE/CA for the Site on May 14, 2002. The = EE/CA was=20 completed on June 10, 2003 and will be deemed completed upon signing of = this=20 Action Memorandum.

2. Site Characteristics

A detailed description of Site characteristics is presented in the = EE/CA.=20

3. Release or threatened release into the environment of a hazardous=20 substance, or pollutant or contaminant.

As stated previously, several historic mining operations existed in = the=20 Empire Canyon drainage. Waste rock and tailings from these operations = were=20 deposited at various locations in the canyon. Sampling has shown the = waste rock=20 and tailings contain elevated levels of several heavy metals, including = lead,=20 arsenic, zinc, and cadmium. Sampling of surface waters, sediments, and = soils in=20 and below Empire Canyon have shown that heavy metals have been released = from=20 mine waste to surface water, ground water, and soils.

4. National Priority List (NPL) Status

Empire Canyon is not listed on the NPL. EPA currently does not = anticipate=20 listing the Site on the NPL.

B. Other Actions to Date

In addition to past investigations described above, numerous other=20 environmentally-based actions have occurred in the Empire Canyon area. = Several=20 are described below:

UPCM is currently in the process of developing several parcels of = land in and=20 near Empire Canyon, herein referred to as the Flagstaff Development. The = Flagstaff Development will include several residential properties. To = determine=20 if there were any mining impacts in this area, UPCM, in conjunction with = EPA,=20 UDEQ, and the USCWSG, conducted detailed sampling of the Flagstaff = Development.=20 This sampling showed that mine waste and heavy metals were present in = very=20 limited areas within the development area, but that most areas were free = from=20 impacts. Further, investigations showed that this area had little or no = impact=20 to surface water in Empire Canyon. UPCM prepared detailed sampling = reports for=20 UDEQ and EPA, and based upon this information, EPA specifically excluded = this=20 area from the boundaries of the Empire Canyon Site and issued UPCM = comfort=20 letters for the development area. The EE/CA, AOCs, and this Action = Memorandum=20 specifically exclude this area from the Empire Canyon Site. Any = environmental=20 issues present in this area were, or are, being handled voluntarily by = UPCM in=20 conjunction with the USCWSG.

The Judge Tunnel is a drain tunnel which underlies much of Empire = Canyon. It=20 is part of an interconnected system of tunnels, shafts, and other = underground=20 mine features that are present in the mountains above Park City. Much, = if not=20 most, of the water that infiltrates into the ground in Empire Canyon may = enter=20 the Judge Tunnel system, where it eventually is discharged in the lower = reaches=20 of the canyon. Park City Municipal Corporation (PCMC) collects this = water and=20 uses it for drinking water. There have been numerous investigations = related to=20 Judge Tunnel, evaluating all aspects of its use as drinking water. Based = upon=20 these investigations, PCMC has already taken several steps to ensure the = safety=20 of the water, and other steps are currently being planned or considered. = These=20 steps include construction of a water treatment plant and obtaining a = Utah=20 Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) permit for any water = discharged=20 to Silver Creek. Because of this separate, but coordinated, effort for = Judge=20 Tunnel, EPA sees no need for intensive investigations into deep ground = water=20 impacts in Empire Canyon.

For various reasons, UPCM has voluntarily addressed several areas of = mine=20 waste in the Empire Canyon drainage. This work includes reshaping and=20 recontouring of mine dumps, consolidation of some contaminated soils and = mine=20 waste into larger mine dumps, and rerouting of surface water. This work = was=20 coordinated with EPA.

As part of the ESI, UDEQ collected samples from private residences = located in=20 the lower portions of Empire Canyon. The purpose of the samples was to = determine=20 if residential soils were impacted by contamination that may have = originated=20 from former mining operations in Empire Canyon. The samples showed that = there=20 were impacts to soils at the properties, specifically elevated levels of = lead=20 and arsenic. However, because there are likely several areas of Park = City that=20 have elevated levels of heavy metals in soils, and because it is = difficult to=20 determine which of many potential sources caused impacts at any = particular=20 property, EPA has chosen to address residential soil impacts = collectively as=20 part of the USCWSG work. Thus, while it is possible that the residential = soil=20 impacts in lower Empire Canyon are the result of sources within the = Empire=20 Canyon Site, these impacts are not addressed in this Action Memo and = will be=20 addressed through other investigations and actions.

C. State and Local Authorities Roles

The UDEQ was very involved in the USCWSG and in the investigation of = Empire=20 Canyon. UDEQ was the lead agency for the PA and ESI. UDEQ was involved = in the=20 oversight of the EE/CA sampling and will also be involved in the = performance of=20 the alternative selected in this Action Memorandum through a direct = agreement=20 with UPCM. Representatives of Park City and Summit County are members of = the=20 USCWSG and were very involved in the investigations and decision making = for the=20 Site.

III. THREATS TO PUBLIC HEALTH OR WELFARE, THE ENVIRONMENT, AND = STATUTORY AND=20 REGULATORY AUTHORITIES

Conditions at the Site present an imminent and substantial = endangerment to=20 human health and meet the criteria for initiating a Removal Action under = 40=20 C.F.R. Section 300.415(b)(2) of the National Contingency Plan (NCP). The = following factors from Section 300.415(b)(2) of the NCP form the basis = for EPA=92s=20 determination of the threat presented and the appropriate action to be=20 taken:

i) Actual or potential exposure to nearby human populations, animals, = or the=20 food chain from hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants.

Heavy metals, particularly zinc and cadmium, migrate from = mine waste=20 in Empire Canyon into Silver Creek. These metals are present in both = water and=20 sediment at concentrations that may impact both fish and the aquatic = food chain=20 and contribute to exceedances of water quality standards in Silver = Creek.=20

(ii) Actual or potential contamination of drinking water supplies or=20 sensitive ecosystems.

Flow from Empire Canyon enters Silver Creek, which feeds = several=20 wetlands at lower elevations. Wetlands are considered an extremely = sensitive and=20 vital ecosystem.

(iv) High levels of hazardous substances or pollutants or = contaminants in=20 soils largely at or near the surface that may migrate.

Mine waste is present at multiple surface locations in Empire = Canyon,=20 including in areas that are frequently in contact with surface water and = snowmelt. Sampling has shown that heavy metals are leached from the mine = waste=20 and migrate into flowing surface waters. Sediments are also impacted and = may=20 migrate during heavy runoff or storm events.

IV. ENDANGERMENT DETERMINATION

The actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from this = Site, if=20 not addressed by implementing the response action selected in this = Action=20 Memorandum, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to = public=20 health or welfare or the environment. Contaminants are verified to be = present at=20 levels which present unacceptable risk to the environment.

V. PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS

A. Proposed Action

1. Objectives and Scope

The primary objective of the removal action is to significantly = reduce heavy=20 metal loading to surface water from sources in Empire Canyon. This load=20 reduction will be achieved through isolation of surface water from mine = wastes=20 in Empire Canyon through a variety of mechanisms. The secondary = objective of the=20 removal action is to minimize the potential for human exposure to = elevated lead=20 and arsenic concentrations in soils within the Empire Canyon Site. This=20 objective will be achieved through consolidating and covering select = areas of=20 mine waste and through surface reclamation.

2. Primary proposed action

Mine waste in areas identified as adversely impacting surface water = will be=20 excavated. The channels will be reconstructed using clean rip-rap = material=20 and/or culverts. Some segments of the channels may also be lined with a = clay=20 liner to keep water on the surface. Several recreational trails in = contact with=20 contaminated soils or mine waste may be covered, and some areas of = trails may=20 also be rerouted. The Daly West mine dump will be re-contoured and = covered with=20 clean material. In certain areas, surface water flow in the vicinity of = the Daly=20 West mine dump will be re-routed to minimize contact with waste rock. A = cut-off=20 ditch will be constructed on the up-gradient side of the dump. Surface = water=20 from the Empire, Daly Draw and Walker Webster channels will be directed = into an=20 underground culvert and isolated from waste rock.

Mine waste removed from channels and trails will be consolidated in = one or=20 more locations in Empire Canyon and managed on-site. The preferred = location is=20 the Daly West Dump, which is currently being evaluated for suitability. = Other=20 locations will be considered as necessary. If waste is moved off-site = for=20 disposal, actions will comply with the Off-Site Rule.

Approximately 4,500 linear feet of channel will be remediated in = lower Empire=20 Canyon. Approximately 2,500 feet of recreational trail may be remediated = throughout Empire Canyon. In addition, remedial activities will be = conducted in=20 areas containing significant amounts of impacted waste rock (e.g., = Alliance mine=20 dump and Daly West). These areas will be regraded and capped with clean=20 material. The Site will be monitored for five years to ensure that the=20 remediation is effective in improving the environmental quality of the = Site.=20 Institutional controls will be implemented as required for the = protection of=20 Site workers and recreational users.

A Post-Removal Site Control Plan, as required in the AOC, will set = forth=20 long-term management plans and responsibilities for Empire Canyon once = the=20 removal action is complete.

3. Contingency Actions

There are no contingency actions identified for the Site.

4. Funding Limitations

There are no known funding limitations restricting response actions = for the=20 Site. However, response actions may be phased over multiple construction = seasons.

5. EE/CA.

An EE/CA was prepared by UPCM for this removal. A public comment = period on=20 the recommended alternative was held from July 23, 2003 to August 21, = 2003. A=20 public meeting was held on August 19, 2003. Park City Municipal = Corporation=20 offered several comments and concerns which have been addressed or will = be=20 addressed during development of the removal work plan. No other adverse = comments=20 were received. The preferred alternative of the EE/CA is the response = action=20 recommended in this Action Memorandum. The EE/CA is part of the = Administrative=20 Record for the Site.

6. ARARs

This removal action will attain, to the extent practicable, Federal = and/or=20 State ARARs, whichever is more stringent. A list of ARARs is included in = Appendix A.

7. Project Schedule.

Some preliminary work has already been completed. Work specified in = this=20 Action Memorandum is expected to begin during spring 2004, contingent = upon=20 execution of an AOC, and is expected to last approximately two = construction=20 seasons.

B. Estimated Costs

The response action is estimated to cost approximately = $1,200,000.

VI. EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE SITUATION SHOULD ACTION BE DELAYED OR NOT=20 TAKEN

If no removal action is taken or if the action is delayed, loading of = heavy=20 metals during spring runoff will continue. It is important to address = Empire=20 Canyon immediately, as it forms the headwaters of Silver Creek. Cleanups = in=20 lower portions of the watershed cannot commence until contamination in = upper=20 portions, such as Empire Canyon, is addressed and the potential for=20 recontamination is removed. It is likely that water quality standards in = Silver=20 Creek will not be attained through remediation of Empire Canyon alone, = but it is=20 also likely that water quality standards cannot be attained consistently = unless=20 and until Empire Canyon is remediated.

VII. OUTSTANDING POLICY ISSUES

There are no known outstanding policy issues regarding this removal=20 action.

VIII. ENFORCEMENT

An enforcement confidential summary is included as Appendix B.


IX. RECOMMENDATION

This decision document represents the selected Removal Action for the = Empire=20 Canyon Site, Park City, Utah and was developed in accordance with = CERCLA, as=20 amended, and is consistent with the NCP. This decision is based on the=20 Administrative Record for the Site.

Conditions at the Site meet the NCP Section 300.415(b)(2) criteria = for a=20 removal and I recommend your approval of the proposed PRP-lead Removal = Action.=20

Approve:_________________________________ Date:_________________

Max H. Dodson

Assistant Regional Administrator

Office of Ecosystems Protections and Remediation

Disapprove:_________________________________ = Date:_________________

Max H. Dodson

Assistant Regional Administrator

Office of Ecosystems Protections and Remediation

Attachments: Appendix A - List of ARARs

Appendix B - Enforcement Summary (Confidential)


Appendix B (Confidential)

ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY

While no formal PRP search was conducted by = EPA, UPCM=20 is the landowner of the Site and may be responsible for conducting = former mining=20 operations in Empire Canyon. UPCM elected to voluntarily enter an AOC to = conduct=20 the EE/CA for the Site, and negotiations are underway with UPCM to = conduct the=20 cleanup. No other PRPs have been identified